Wednesday, November 21, 2012

WNW: A Twitchy Mistake: "Let Alone"

Some time ago, two friends (Sarah M. Eden and TJ Bronley), brought up a grammatical pet peeve they shared: the misuse of "let alone."

It was one of those things that I hadn't noticed too much . . . until someone pointed it out. Turns out that yep, people do use this one wrong, and with somewhat alarming frequency.

Here's how you use "let alone": 
"Let alone" ups the stakes. Generally, the speaker/writer is referring to two things, one much bigger/worse/awful/awesome than the other.

Rules of thumb: 
(1) The smaller "less wow" item is first.
(2) The item with the biggest "wow" factor is mentioned second, after "let alone."

And that is where people make the mistake: by putting "let alone" next to the lesser item.


Example #1 (courtesy TJ)
Incorrect: 
Five-year-old Timmy asked for a pet, but we aren't getting a pony, let a lone a dog.

Here, the sentence implies that a pony is a common pet, while a dog (a DOG!) is something totally out of the realm of possibility, a ridiculous idea.

Correct: 
Five-year-old Timmy asked for a pet, but we aren't getting a dog [lesser pet!], let a lone a pony [the WOW pet!].


Example #2 (courtesy Sarah)
Incorrect: 
I've never been to London, let alone  Salt Lake City.

For most of my readers (likely Utahns) and even those throughout the U.S. and the world, Salt Lake City is by far the lesser "wow" of the two cities. For starters, SLC, as an actual settled city (not counting Native Americans who may have lived in the area) doesn't even have 200 years of history yet, while London has hundreds and hundreds of years' worth.

Correct:
I've never been to Salt Lake City [the lesser city, assuming you're big about history, art, literature, etc.], let alone London [the holy grail for writers and English major nerds like me, ergo the WOW city to visit].

***

As with many of my Word Nerd Wednesday posts, this issue probably a lot of readers wondering how anyone could get that wrong. Good!

For those few people who didn't know the correct way of using "let alone," now you can go forth and use it properly over Thanksgiving dinner, knowing that the word nerd at your table won't choke on a turkey bone.



6 comments:

T.J. said...

Something I said is beneficial! Yay!!!!!!

Jennie said...

I have no problem with the order of the two comparisons. Where I mess up is a tendency to say leave alone instead of let alone. I know which is correct, but I tend to say it the way I heard it at home when I was a kid.

Sue said...

That is an error I've heard occasionally, too. It always makes me smile to myself.

;)

Sue said...

(I posted my Christmas story poem early this year...If you have a minute, come over and check it out. You might want to leave your volume up, too; the music really adds.)

=)

Hazel_Myope said...

I have never heard this mistake before. Maybe it's an Americanism like 'I could care less'.

In England we have another version of 'let alone' with let being an old or regional way of saying leave as in 'let it alone'.

Lara said...

I don't know if I have ever noticed this before. Of course, now that I've read this, I will see it everywhere.

Black Friday Flash Sale!

UNDER THE MISTLETOE  ONLY 99 CENTS: CLICK HERE This volume is a collection of (PG-rated!) contemporary romances, all with a Christmas t...